Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts

Monday, November 11, 2013

RCS as a Platform. Concept, deploying API easily and Monetization case. New Solaiemes site to explain the how to.

http://rcsasaplatform.com/

Solaiemes has published a minisite "RCS as a platform by Solaiemes" to make easier to understand the potential of instant messaging as a la platform, how to deploy in days the network API and offer it to the developers and how to monetize "RCS" using as context for advertisement third party cases created with the API.

Yes, RCS has a business case, and can be the initial point for telcos take a slice of the cake of contextual advertising business.

Telcos, it'stime to get down to work and we can help :-)


Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts

Monday, June 25, 2007

Is AdSense/Words a proper model for Mobile Advertisment?

A lot of people in carriers, internet companies are thinking about how to extend the online marketing/advertisment to mobile and it seems it is not a succesful task.
The successful Google model (AdSense/AdWords) faces difficult constraints with mobile: display size, not too extensive mobile browsing by users due to usability & concerns and uncertain conection costs, etc.

Sometimes when a model is so succesful people tries to replicate it in all "access way" but the answer for the question in the title is NOOOOOOOOOO !!! :-)

For mobile our purpose is re-starting from scratch. Important keys for us:

1/ free for users,
2/ not intrusive,
3/ carriers getting revenue from advertisers,
4/ advertisers getting more for same investment, business intellienge integrated with mobile advertisment

this is our aproach, our model will be explained soon

juan mateu

Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile advertisment. Show all posts

Monday, June 11, 2007

Towards an all IP model?

Last years we have seen that mobile applications have been closely modelled as Internet Web applications, with some significant differences though. Mainly related to the adaptation to terminal capabilities and to the operator part, and this is a very important one. When talking about Wap instead of Web or IMS applications instead of pure IP applications you get some advantages for sure: better service quality, user identification, billing, etc, but somehow the differences with the pure Internet model may be dragging the success of mobile applications. You can look at success cases in the Internet (Google, YouTube, etc.) that have no real counterparts in the mobile world. So where is the problem?
The problem may reside in two elements:

  • Excessive operator dependencies. Although it is nice to have the operator as an intermediate for use identification, billing to the final user, etc, it complicates the technological and business model. The pure internet model is much simpler, and in all success cases they show they really don't need the operator apart from its data carrier service. In fact there are some pure Internet players that are expanding to the mobile world using a pure Internet/Web approach. Google is doing well and using their maps service in a mobile terminal is a very good experience, with the added value that you can use it while you are on the move. Perhaps that is the right approach and for many mobile applications we don't need any operator support and just use the current web browsing capabilities in terminals or J2ME applets.
  • Lack of adaptation to terminal capabilities and usability of mobile applications. Probably this is the main point and it deserves a complete talking about it. Just two important points: first, in the mobile world with terminals with small screens and without keyboards, ergonomy becomes crucial, and using web applications as in a laptop is probably not a good idea. We still have to see which is the correct model, but probably, multimodal services, that combine several modes of input and output of information are around the correct model. Consider the capability of browsing the web using a mobile terminal through voice commands, and getting the information videographically. Second point: mobile applications model have been driven by terminal vendors, that have decided technological environment and even programming APIs (Symbian, J2ME, etc.). However new players are entering the game, like Apple with their iPhone and the already in-place Windows mobile from Microsoft. They intend to be big players in this game, and for that reason they need to give better accesibility to services, and this will probably will change the landscape in the mobile applications market.